Compelling Nude Portraits Explore Both Self-Identity and Stereotypes (NSFW)


Triptych 5


Triptych 5 detail

Bodies. Naked. Words. The image came to Brooklyn-based photographer Lauren Renner during a nap. Her project In Others’ Words features Renner’s three-paneled images of nude individuals shot with a 4×5 view camera, their bodies covered in words others have used to describe them. Total strangers write these words on each other’s naked bodies, making In Others’ Words an exercise in understanding vulnerability, knowing oneself, and transcending the labels our culture is so quick to provide. We recently asked her more about the project.


Triptych 2


Triptych 2 detail


Triptych 1


Triptych 1 detail

What made you decide to undertake this project? What was your thought process in assembling its visual details? 
“The idea for this project was one that revealed itself to me over time and manifested originally as my BFA Thesis project. Incidentally, I also began dating women for the first time in my life while this new artistic discovery was going on. I began to notice that even though I was living in an exceedingly liberal place, people were starting to categorize me a bit differently. It was both scary and fascinating, and also a shock because I didn’t feel as though I’d suddenly morphed into a completely different person, yet somehow my sexuality was the characterizing feature that had skyrocketed to the forefront. It was utterly bizarre to me, so I began to wonder what experiences other individuals had around being labeled, and how it affected their relationships with their self-identity.”


Triptych 4


Triptych 4 detail

Why was it important to you to have people writing on each other?
“Because it simulates the act we commit of labeling each other in society every day. Ideally if there are multiple people participating in a shoot, I like to have them take their clothes off and write on each other as soon as they arrive. By stripping away their clothing, I’m essentially eliminating any pre-conceived context between them, and leveling the playing field.

“I ask that the participants come to the shoot with a pre-prepared list of 50-100 stereotypes/labels that they have experienced being pigeonholed as in their lives. Once the writing begins, sometimes there is some awkward giggling and banter as the volunteers get used to each other’s bodies and overall presence. This almost always palpably transitions into a sort of sacred, self-involved energy as they get comfortable. I move around them, and shoot as this happens, but the interaction between them during that time completely belongs to them.

“It never ceases to amaze me how intimate that process can be. Not only is this person baring their physical vulnerability to you by being nude, but they are sharing words with you that have played deep roles in how they self identify—words that have affected their daily experience as they move through the world, for better or for worse. It’s very powerful.”


What has the project taught you about the way people look at themselves versus how others look at them? 
“When it comes down to it, no matter who is labeling you, all of those words and constructs become a mish-mash inside of you, and seem to inform each other. Words carry a tremendous amount of power, which is why breaking away from some and holding onto others can feel so insurmountable. On the flip side of that coin, I think people tend to become very comfortable in the ways in which they categorize others, to the point where they may not even be aware that they’re doing it in the first place.

“After all, at the end of the day we put people into boxes because subconsciously it makes them easier for us to mentally digest. Seeing people view my work for the first time was a huge experience for me because I got to see how people reacted when the boxes they were accustomed to had been taken away.”

Lauren Renner

Lauren Renner

In Others’ Words is currently on view at JANGEORGe Gallery in East Hampton, NY through the end of August 2014.

If you would like to participate in In Others’ Words, Renner is always seeking participants of all ages, backgrounds, identities, and ethnicities to be photographed. Please feel free to reach out to the artist at lauren (at) laurenrenner (dot) com.

  • melanie

    This is not compelling work. It’s very ‘ho-hum’. Would be better suited to a one-off live art performance.

  • 7765

    So… In the harsh light of objectivity are we to take it that: junk photos made with a large camera are art? Maybe you can resurrect the view camera industry for those suckers who think equipment makes the photos?

  • Casey Johnson

    The snobbery is strong with these comments- I personally find this project moving and the message is beyond your capacity to see passed the lens

  • anonimous666

    Fucking Facebook, censoring this images every time someone share them.

  • lakawak

    Yes…you are inherently better than those who think that putting words on a body and calling it art is stupid.

  • Jennifer Milner-Lunt

    It’s not about the action itself though, it’s what the action means and represents. People are quick to judge what whether something is or isn’t ‘art’ without stopping to think about what a piece is saying outside of the definition ‘art’. Does it really matter? Writing words on a body is just the medium the artist chose to convey a message. Here is a piece I did a while back, also done through writing on the body.

  • CrankyFranky


  • lickitysplity

    Can you possibly get any stupider then these people? Hahahahaha. JUST LOOK at these freaking idiots. This is not art….its a total lack of intelligence IMO

  • Altitude5280

    White haired woman has a dangly.

  • Sonny Wyatt

    Then vs than… apparently one can get “stupider”.

  • imongo

    Morons who draw on themselves and expect others to appreciate their art. Back to the mental hospital with the lot of them.

  • jaminarii

    pretentious arty bullshit relying on the shock value of seeing nudity rather than any actual talent or thought.

    This isn’t deep it’s just shit.

  • Mike Hoyle

    The very essence of being a vulnerable human, you can’t get any more ‘real world’ than this.

  • Boreal Explorer

    Perhaps you could share your creativity with all of us, then…?

    Yeah, that’s what I thought.

  • Boreal Explorer

    I’m kind of amazed any art site would even enable comments in this day and age. god.

  • I really like this project. Striping off the clothes revealing how we are in true reality. Not only exposing the the nakedness of the flesh but with the writing also exposing the nakedness off our emotions and complexity of each human being. We are so much more than style, sex, popularity and all those things that our society rates and judges us by….. or am I just going to deep ? ; )

  • comment

    Are you joking? What exactly is the purpose of art if it is not to stimulate discussion? disabling comments would render the work virtually pointless

  • Heike

    dang. you sure got the ‘boreal’ part right about your s/n. brrrr!!

  • Sascha616

    I’m not shocked at seeing the nudity. What’s shocking about nudity? We’re all nude under our clothes.

  • Sascha616

    Commenter has no clue about female organs.

  • Brandán Gómez


  • Guest

    I don’t understand the pairing/groupings. Are they supposed to be related, one family, or just random people? Aesthetically they do bear a resemblance to one another and this adds to the uniformity of the bodies. Just wondering if that was the artist’s intent.

  • Tony

    I’m interested in how this artist paired & grouped the models. There seems to be a family resemblance within the group of four. That lends to the uniformity of the subjects, but as I study it closer, I see a lot of contrasts. Intriguing stuff.

  • Tony

    To stimulate intelligent conversation, yes. I hope the ignorant people who have no clue how to interpret an artistic photograph will just shut their ignorant asses up.

  • Thomas Jeter

    Really? Art is art and u can’t change wut others may see as art. I see guns as art, cars as art, the sky as art. So just bc u don’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not wut it is.

  • MichaelRWorthingon

    It is a total bore, which is probably what the worst art ever is.

  • stupocalypse

    Fonts could be better.

  • Hank Lazar

    I am enjoying the art but not the website. It is difficult to navigate and I never know if I will be able to view images. And I wonder how you expect me to purchase a book of images when I am only able to see one photograph. I want to see what my $45 is buying!

  • Glenn Davey

    Your comment is a brilliant example of your point. Whiny people everywhere, including YOU

  • Manofthehour John Lawerence Ba

    Some of them could surely use a nice shave. Lol

  • Parkinson Sniper

    Wow for the old lady…she is still in shape!

  • Allebrukernavnertatt

    Guess the razor got too dull after you used it to shave your brain cells.

  • HerpingtonVanDerpstra

    The belief that the purpose of art is to stimulate discussion is a common misconception, which has been purposefully encouraged by commercial enterprises attempting to use art for marketing purposes. (ArtPrize in Grand Rapids MI is a great example of this.)
    The real purpose of art has historically always been to create beauty and evoke emotion. To improve the world, not merely to make it more interesting.
    Viewers of artworks may feel differently about that purpose, as may people who want to create powerful pieces of art but who lack the abilities, but ultimately the test of art always ends up being which kinds of work are still treasured by humanity after centuries. To this point in history it is the works which transcend conversation and subdue discussion which have been held as definitive.

  • HerpingtonVanDerpstra

    The content is indeed powerful and moving. But that doesn’t by itself make good art.

    To me, these photographs are poor examples of art not because of their content but because of the fact that they are simply badly made photographs. Bad lighting/exposure, bad color/tonal balance, bad composition…in almost every single shot you can point to at least one very basic flaw in technique.

  • Mandalore_15

    How powerful… Wish I could make money by standing around naked and writing some incoherent shit on my body with magic marker.

  • Sam

    How does one know that they’ve interpreted art correctly? When they agree with you?

  • Tony

    That’s the best answer I’ve seen. And you’re right. Art doesn’t have to exist for debate. It is to evoke an emotional response that can be erotic but not limited to it. There are rules to interpreting art and it doesn’t take much effort to educate oneself on this technique. And I hope that someone’s interpretation does not agree with mine, so that i can be exposed to a different perspective.

  • The Darling Kinkshamer

    No, I don’t think so.

  • Simon Briggs

    I disagree. There is a CONSTANT debate and discourse between one movement and the movement which preceded it. Namely Romantic and Classical perspectives.

    Sure, ONE art movement in particular may not particularly value debate or intellectual pursuits, but you can bet that another manifesto will say otherwise.

    You can’t generalize all art. Artworks are like people, each one is different, but we classify them into movements, schools or styles to assist in analyzing them.

  • Simon Briggs

    It’s one thing to have a fantastic concept, idea, hypothesis, thesis, et cetera, and another to create a successful artwork from that.

    Why not write a book, a poem, film a documentary about what you’re trying to say?

    Why use a marker on a model, writing explicit words to convey this message?

    I’m not saying that work like this isn’t art, but from a formalist or aesthetic perspective, it doesn’t do much visually. At least that’s my two bits.

  • njguy54

    Interesting how every woman has the word “slut” written on her…

  • Johnny Smoketree

    I believe these photos rendered themselves utterly pointless, thus no need for comments.

  • Johnny Smoketree

    Because this “art” is a purely moronic concept by a moronic artist who doesn’t have the talent (or the money) to write a book, a poem, or film a documentary.

  • Johnny Smoketree

    Well said. Entirely true. From a technical perspective: The photos are horrific for the reasons you’ve listed. From an artistic perspective: The “art” is childish, trite and smacks of a failed 1987 ad campaign for Benetton.

  • Johnny Smoketree

    You need to lay off the pipe, bro.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get some visual inspiration into your day!