<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Small, New York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.featureshoot.com/2010/02/sarah-small-new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.featureshoot.com/2010/02/sarah-small-new-york/</link>
	<description>Travel Fashion Documentary Editorial &#38; Portrait Photographers: Feature Shoot&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alison Zavos</title>
		<link>http://www.featureshoot.com/2010/02/sarah-small-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-10406</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Zavos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.featureshoot.com/?p=7117#comment-10406</guid>
		<description>Hey Davin,
Thanks so much for pointing this out.  Not sure what went wrong, but it&#039;s fixed now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Davin,<br />
Thanks so much for pointing this out.  Not sure what went wrong, but it&#8217;s fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davin</title>
		<link>http://www.featureshoot.com/2010/02/sarah-small-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-10383</link>
		<dc:creator>Davin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.featureshoot.com/?p=7117#comment-10383</guid>
		<description>Hi
Just a quick note to say that all of these shots have been resized poorly in a way that alters their original proportions so they all look fuzzy and stretched out.

The first shot, for example, is sized to 480 by 380 but if you compare it to the larger shot on Sarah’s site (http://www.sarahsmall.com/photos/hires/pc2886fI.jpg) you’ll see that if it were sized proportionally, it should be 480 by 320.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Just a quick note to say that all of these shots have been resized poorly in a way that alters their original proportions so they all look fuzzy and stretched out.</p>
<p>The first shot, for example, is sized to 480 by 380 but if you compare it to the larger shot on Sarah’s site (<a href="http://www.sarahsmall.com/photos/hires/pc2886fI.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.sarahsmall.com/photos/hires/pc2886fI.jpg</a>) you’ll see that if it were sized proportionally, it should be 480 by 320.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger link</title>
		<link>http://www.featureshoot.com/2010/02/sarah-small-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-10381</link>
		<dc:creator>roger link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.featureshoot.com/?p=7117#comment-10381</guid>
		<description>radical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>radical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
